Popsixle focuses on enhancing data sent to Facebook and Instagram, improving audience targeting and conversion tracking, while also offering server-side tracking and identity resolution. Addingwell provides server-side tracking and tools for data quality and performance but lacks specific audience targeting features. Littledata stands out with its 30-day free trial, fully automatic no-code setup, and automatic tracking of checkout steps, alongside identity resolution and server-side tracking. This makes Littledata a more comprehensive solution for ecommerce managers seeking ease of use and enhanced data insights.

For 50 orders, Popsixle is 6% more expensive than Addingwell and 144% more than Littledata. At 500 orders, Popsixle and Addingwell are equal, while Littledata is 10% more expensive. For 5,000 orders, Popsixle is 351% more than Addingwell and 67% more than Littledata. At 20,000 orders, Popsixle is 174% more than Addingwell and 37% more than Littledata. Overall, Popsixle tends to be the most expensive, especially at higher order volumes.

Popsixle focuses on integrating data specifically for Meta Ads, optimizing ad performance through tailored insights. In contrast, Addingwell offers a broader range of data destinations, including Google Analytics, Meta Ads, TikTok, Google Ads, and Pinterest, allowing for comprehensive cross-platform tracking and analysis. Littledata also provides extensive integrations, including Google Analytics, Meta Ads, TikTok, Pinterest, Klaviyo, Google Ads, Segment, and Attentive, emphasizing a holistic view of customer interactions across multiple channels. The main difference lies in the breadth of integrations and the specific focus of each solution on different advertising platforms.