Polar Analytics offers comprehensive marketing reporting and a proprietary attribution model, focusing on e-commerce insights with pre-built dashboards. Popsixle emphasizes server-side tracking and optimizes data for Facebook and Instagram, enhancing audience targeting. Littledata stands out with its 30-day free trial, fully automatic setup, and automatic tracking of checkout steps, providing a user-friendly experience. While Polar excels in reporting and attribution, and Popsixle in social media data accuracy, Littledata's ease of use and trial offer may appeal more to those seeking a straightforward implementation.

For an online store with 50 orders, Polar Analytics is 320% more expensive than Popsixle and 923% more than Littledata. At 500 orders, Polar and Popsixle are equal, while Littledata is 63% cheaper than both. With 5000 orders, Polar is 360% more than Popsixle and 229% more than Littledata. Finally, at 20000 orders, Polar is 341% more expensive than Popsixle and 338% more than Littledata. Overall, Polar Analytics consistently has the highest pricing across all order volumes.

Polar Analytics focuses on aggregating data from various sources, allowing for centralized reporting and insights across Meta Ads, Google Ads, and Klaviyo. Popsixle primarily emphasizes real-time data tracking for Meta Ads, optimizing ad performance through immediate insights. Littledata offers a broader range of data destinations, including Google Analytics, TikTok, and Pinterest, providing extensive tracking capabilities across multiple platforms. The main difference lies in Polar's comprehensive analytics approach, Popsixle's real-time focus on Meta Ads, and Littledata's diverse integration options for a wider array of marketing channels.